Documentaries have always been a little dry because of their factual
basis and more than a little depressing because of their social and
political subject matter: war; poverty; disease. They have also been,
for the most part, the arena of more left leaning ideas. Now Michael
Moore, with a little help from Errol Morris, has done the unthinkable,
he’s made docs fun as well as intelligent. Webster’s
defines a document as “anything used as proof” and documentary
as a film or TV program that “shows news events/social conditions
in a dramatic story based mainly on facts.” Along comes Moore
who adds humor and irony to the genre, and poof, people are lining
up to see documentaries. The problem is that as his work has become
more popular, it has ceased to resemble a documentary and leaves
the genre in danger of following the path of reality TV into entertainment
over substance. That said, I was taken aback when I saw Michael Moore’s
FAHRENHEIT 9/11, and not because of Moore’s and not because
he reveals Bush to be a ninny in a power-suit with his finger on
the button, but because one of our best political watchdogs and documentarians
seems to imply that by replacing one man, we can end the vile international
joke that US politics has become, and, with the exception of the
Florida footage, he does it with tongue in cheek using facts that
any savvy NPR listener has put together for themselves over the last
four years.
The film that brought him into the public eye, ROGER AND ME is stunning
in its philosophical questioning of how much social responsibility
a large company owes it’s workers. His Academy Award winning
documentary, BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE, is also a high point in documentary
history as Moore is able to capture the culpability of an entire town
and by extension, US society, for the school shooting at Columbine.
Perhaps Moore’s attempt to go from local issues that become national,
to national issues that are global that is the cause of his less than
stellar turn in FAHRENHEIT 9/11. Moore distills the Iraq war, the 2000
election debacle and the US obsession with OPEC oil down to one man:
George W. Bush and his misleading of the American people into the Iraq
war by tricking them into believing that Iraq was at the root of 9/11.
Is a politician manipulating the people’s opinions unexpected?
And more importantly, is it possible for one man to be responsible
for such an act?
The manipulation of the public to get it to support war has a fine
tradition in this country: World War I; Vietnam; the Gulf War. And
while people who do
not remember history are not necessarily doomed to repeat it, they should be
able to explain, if only to themselves, that strange feeling of déjà vu
when the sequel to the last bad war shows up at a theater near them. HIDDEN WARS
OF THE DESERT is an excellent user friendly documentary that lays out the reasons
for the continued American political interest in Iraq, in other words why we
can’t seem to stop bombing the life out of it. Painful in its narrative
of American motivation, it shows how, in the last Gulf War, headed by Bush, Sr.
the US administration told the American people that Iraq had to be invaded to
defend Kuwait. What they didn’t tell anyone, though you could find the
information if you looked hard enough, was that Iraq had asked the US if they
had a pact with Kuwait to protect it if Iraq invaded and the US administration
said, no. Next, and this may sound familiar, the UN wanted to mediate the problem
but the US said war was the only answer. The US Army proceeded to do operational
training with just this scenario: what if Iraq invaded, say, oh, um, Kuwait?
Why the deception and sacrifice of Kuwait? To show Saudi Arabia that Iraq troops
were massing at its border so we could be the first country with a military base
of operations in an OPEC country.
While Bush is evil in means and action, he
is not a new breed of dog. He is also not the sole manipulator
of our political
motivation toward war, as Moore would have you believe. One of
Bush’s most important allies in the coalition in the battle
for the support of the good US citizens for his war was the Fox
Network, owned by Rupert Murdoch, who, by the way, owns: over
100 cable stations; over 100 radio stations; over 100 magazines;
and the list goes on. One man, who thought that Reagan was a
god, owns the main news source for millions of voters. He is
against liberal thought, against Democrats, against same sex
marriage and for Christianity, conservatism and George W. Bush.
His CEO, Roger Ailes, is the former Media Strategist for the
Reagan and both Bush administrations. Murdock is one of 5 men/companies
that own ALL of the major news sources in the country. Think
about that, there are 5 companies, all interested in turning
a profit, (and who helps companies turn a profit better than
the Republicans), that give the news on which millions base their
opinions about the world. Moore completely ignores this source
of support for Bush and instead focuses on comedic things like
Bush’s thin grasp of the English language, which is funny,
but nowhere near as frightening as the exploitation and monopolization
of unbiased news in our country. Moore goes for the easy horror:
footage from 9/11.
In his amazing documentary OUTFOXED, Robert Greenwald chronicles
the Fox Network’s bold, unchallenged use of opinion tainted
facts in order to support everything the Bush administration
has done. In their simplest manipulations Fox puts catch phrases,
like “the war in Iraq is going well”, directly from
the White House briefings into their broadcasts. Greenwald shows
us at least 10 instances of “reporters” on Fox using
the exact words given to them by briefings to report the “news.” This
is not news reporting, this is kissing ass and controlling public
opinion. Their most subtle, at least for people who don’t
think for themselves, attempt to sway opinion against Bush’s
opposition in the coming election is the current, constant references
to John Kerry and how he looks “very French” hoping
to evoke the French hating craze of the previous year. Greenwald’s
is the documentary to watch if you want to understand the complex
workings of the politics of the Bush administration’s manipulation
of Americans. Greenwald gives us a documentary that outlines
the problem, and gives a laundry list of things people are doing
to fight back, including buying low frequency radio stations
so they can report local news in their area and play whatever
music they like.
Yet another documentary that is in many ways better at documenting
issues is last year’s Academy Award winner for documentary,
Errol Morris’ THE FOG OF WAR, a discussion with Robert
McNamara: Air Force strategist during WW I; CEO of Ford Motors;
Secretary of Defense under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations;
and finally president of the World Bank for many years. Morris
has made some amazing docs: GATES OF HEAVEN, about the pet cemetery
industry; THE THIN BLUE LINE, that actually helped get an innocent
man off of death row; and MR. DEATH about an electric chair repair
man who was a holocaust denier. In FOG OF WAR, McNamara discusses
the real responsibilities of defending the US against a real
threat, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the problems of running
an unpopular and most likely immoral war like Vietnam. McNamara
is a strong speaker in the twilight of his life and, having had
time to reflect on the rights and wrongs of his actions, gives
a brutally honest telling of how politics work when the president
wants war and the people do not.
Where Greenwald gives us a damning chronicle of the Bush administration and its
foot soldiers, and Morris give us food for thought about what goes into making
difficult moral decisions when you are actually in charge of them, Moore gives
us documentary-light. One comedic sketch after another about the Keystone Cop
named George W. Bush. So Bush manipulated the public; so he is friendly with
a foreign OPEC family for whom he does favors; so he wants to do anything to
be reelected. He is a politician folks there is no mystery to his actions. Moore
ignores that a conspiracy takes more than one person and makes Bush the boogie
man of the hour and the simple act of making sure he does not get elected again
a way to keep the monster out from under the bed. Make no mistake, removing Bush
from office is an important goal for all voters, but it is not a catch all for
solving the threat to democracy that allowed him to be elected. We’re going
to have to do more than show up at the polls for this mess to be cleaned up.